AI Governance
Common Sense found failures in ChatGPT for Teens safeguards involving age recognition, crisis referrals, and parental notifications. Here’s what the assessment confirms, what it does not prove, and what AI governance teams should review.
AI safety policy
The White House AI safety accord, NIST guidance, and Senate proposals take different approaches to testing, oversight, and deployment decisions.
AI Governance
Four subscribers allege Anthropic, OpenAI, Google and SpaceXAI coordinated to slow AI development. The case puts a new focus on where legitimate AI safety cooperation ends and coordinated competitive decision-making may begin.
AI safety policy
Anthropic and OpenAI disclosed separate AI safety incidents during cyber evaluations. For enterprise leaders, the question is shifting from safety promises to evidence that controls, monitoring, and containment work under stress.
AI Governance
Meta’s settlement, Colorado’s Chatbot Safety Act, and the FTC’s AI companion study show youth-safety governance moving toward product controls, testing, monitoring, and evidence of performance—without creating one national safety standard.
AI safety policy
Illinois's SB 315 mandates the first annual third-party AI safety audits in the U.S., effective 2028. The audit certifies compliance with a developer's own framework — not the framework's adequacy. Here's what that distinction means for compliance and legal teams.
AI safety policy
The International AI Safety Report’s evaluation-gap findings raise a business-crime assurance question: whether test performance is enough evidence for real-world control confidence.
AI Governance
Two OpenAI wrongful-death complaints put chatbot safety controls, warnings, refusals, escalation, access restrictions, and model behavior into the pleadings.
Third-Party Risk
Reporting indicates Anthropic publicly rejected Pentagon contract terms described as a “final offer,” reframing the issue from negotiation leverage to the durability of vendor-imposed AI governance limits under procurement pressure.
AI Governance
Defense officials reportedly sought “all lawful use” assurances for AI tools under contract. The structural question: do federal procurement terms override corporate AI safety policies once models enter national security systems?